User talk:Central Bankster

Welcome!

Hello, Central Bankster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 08:55, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve RBI Belapur

Hi, I'm Matty.007. Central Bankster, thanks for creating RBI Belapur!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Just needs some categories, then looks good

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Mat ty.007 18:16, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Madan Khadgi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Madan Khadgi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Fiddle Faddle 08:53, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article may be revived as a stub, so that further information can be added.Central Bankster (talk) 06:56, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding branches etc of Reserve Bank of India

Please stop and consider carefully whether the many articles that you are adding should be free standing articles. I havem so far, tagged all of the ones you have created to be merged into the main article. That is where I believe they belong, but in a radically shorter manner.

Before you add any further articles please look at and contribute to the discussion there. A consensus must be formed and you must then abide by that consensus, as must I. Fiddle Faddle 08:58, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013

Hello, I'm Timtrent. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Reserve Bank of India without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! You removed two maintenance templates without giving a reason. These templates are present for the use and information of other users Fiddle Faddle 09:12, 17 August 2013 (UTC) Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Duvvuri Subbarao may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.[reply]

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

subbarao-an-rbi-governor-who-can-hold-his-own/|title= Subbarao - A Governor who can hold his own (article in Reuters}}</ref> However, it was during Subbarao's tenure that the value of Indian Rupee

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:14, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RBI Panaji for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RBI Panaji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBI Panaji until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 09:19, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RBI Kochi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RBI Kochi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBI Kochi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 09:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RBI Chandigarh for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RBI Chandigarh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBI Chandigarh until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 09:24, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RBI Bhopal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RBI Bhopal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBI Bhopal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 09:26, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of RBI Belapur for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article RBI Belapur is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RBI Belapur until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fiddle Faddle 09:27, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject India invitation

Namaste! Central Bankster,

Behalf of WikiProject India I am inviting you to join our WikiProject. To see what is happening now in WikiProject India, follow our noticeboard. If you are not a member already, you can add your name here. If are already a member, disregard this message. Thank you. -- Tito☸Dutta 22:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC). [reply]

If you have any question or comment you can post at my talk page clicking here. Best --Tito☸Dutta 22:52, 30 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deepak Singhal ED moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Deepak Singhal ED, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:36, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Deepak Singhal ED has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Deepak Singhal ED. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 08:39, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Central Bankster, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Draft:Deepak Singhal, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Deepak Singhal (banker) has been accepted

Deepak Singhal (banker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 19:14, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India)" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India). Since you had some involvement with the Deepak Singhal (Reserve Bank of India) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 09:06, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Deepak Singhal (banker) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deepak Singhal (banker) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deepak Singhal (banker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:14, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Deepak Singhal, RBI" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Deepak Singhal, RBI. Since you had some involvement with the Deepak Singhal, RBI redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 15:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Lovaananda (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:27, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Central Bankster (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

When I tried to edit the article Urjit Patel I got a message that my account is disabled from editing the same. Kindly resolve this issue. Central Bankster (talk) 14:02, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You're blocked as a sockpuppet. In your next unblock request you should address this. PhilKnight (talk) 14:18, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.